High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Nainital
The Uttarakhand High Court was established in 2000, when Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh. It has jurisdiction over the state of Uttarakhand.
63+
News & Updates Published
Judgment
Cheque Bounce Case: Summons Against Nainital Man Quashed Over Non-Compliance of Section 202 CrPC: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court recently delivered an important judgment in a cheque dishonour dispute and set aside a summoning order issued by a trial court. The decision was delivered by Justice Ashish Naithani, who held that the magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 202 Code of…
Order
Akhlaq Lynching Case: State’s Plea to Close Case Rejected by Court: Uttar Pradesh Court
A trial court in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, has rejected the application filed by the Uttar Pradesh Government seeking withdrawal of criminal prosecution in the murder case of Mohammed Akhlaq. The Court made it clear that once serious charges like murder are framed and evidence supports the prosecution, the State cannot…
Judgment
Errors Repeatedly Creeping into Judicial Exam Question Papers; Course Correction Ordered: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court examined serious irregularities in the preliminary examination of the Uttarakhand Judicial Service Civil Judge (Junior Division) Examination 2025, conducted by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (UKPSC) on 31 August 2025. The issue came before the Court after judicial aspirants…
Order
Court Orders Swift Resolution in Dishonoured Cheque Case: Vikram Singh Panwar V/S Taran Kala Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act - High Court of Uttarakhand
Introduction to the Case In a recent ruling, the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital has directed the expedited hearing of a complaint case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The case involves Vikram Singh Panwar (the applicant) seeking action against Taran Kala (the respondent) for…
Judgment
High Court Rejects Request to Re-Examine Complainant in Rs. 2.4 Lakh Cheque Bounce Case – What It Means for Justice! - High Court of Uttarakhand
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to Re-examine Complainant Rejected by High Court In a recent case heard by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the court has dismissed an application filed by the Petitioner, Lalit Singh Bisht, seeking the quashing of an order passed by the…
Order
Takedown of Posts Against Woman Lawyer Who Secured Acquittal for POCSO Accused Ordered: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has taken suo motu cognizance of threatening and provocative social media posts targeting a woman lawyer who represented clients recently acquitted by the Supreme Court in a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The matter was initiated after the…
Order
Chairman/Member of Cooperative Tribunal Entitled to Revised Pension After Deduction of Parent Service Benefits: Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant ruling, the Uttarakhand High Court has held that individuals who serve as Chairman or Member of the Uttarakhand Cooperative Tribunal after retiring from their parent service are entitled to revised pension, gratuity, and other post-retiral benefits. The division bench comprising Justice Ravindra…
Order
Does S. 482 BNSS Override State's Anticipatory Bail Restrictions Under Section 438 CrPC? Issue Referred to Larger Bench: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court, in a significant judgment, has referred to a larger bench the legal question involving the applicability of Section 482, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) over the Uttarakhand State Amendment to Section 438, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The issue revolves around…
Order
Conviction of Vaccine Scientist Booked for Abetment of Wife’s Suicide Stayed Citing 'National Interest': Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant development, the Uttarakhand High Court on July 11, 2025, stayed the conviction of Dr. Akash Yadav, a vaccine scientist, who was convicted under Section 306, Indian Penal Code for allegedly abetting the suicide of his wife. The court observed that allowing him to resume his critical vaccine research…
Order
Panchayat Polls | Fake or Genuine Votes? Only Election Petition Can Decide Such Disputes: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent order dated July 25, 2025, the Uttarakhand High Court rejected a writ petition filed by Rajendra Singh Chauhan, who contested the Kshetra Panchayat 2 elections from Joshi Gothan, Tehsil Kalsi, District Dehradun. He claimed that 38 fake votes were cast in Polling Booth No. 82, located at Junior High School,…
Order
ADM Says 'Can't Speak English'; Question Raised on Fitness for Executive Role: Uttarakhand High Court
In a notable development, the Uttarakhand High Court, while hearing a matter related to the preparation of electoral rolls under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994, questioned whether an officer lacking English language communication skills can effectively manage an executive post.…
Order
Only Wilful Disobedience Constitutes Contempt, Case Closed Against IIM Kashipur Interim Chairman and CAO: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court, while hearing a contempt petition filed by Vinay Sharma, has clarified that not every form of disobedience of a court order amounts to contempt. The proceedings stemmed from an allegation of wilful disobedience of the High Court's order dated October 2024, passed in WPSB No. 549 of 2024,…
Judgment
Proof of Saptapadi Ceremony Not Required at the Cognizance Stage in a Bigamy Complaint: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has made an important ruling regarding cases of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court clarified that proving whether the essential ceremonies of a second marriage, such as Saptapadi, were performed is a matter to be decided during the trial, not at the initial…
Judgment
Corruption Trials Against Former Jim Corbett Director and Senior Forest Officials Transferred to Special CBI Court: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has ordered the transfer of two corruption cases involving the former Director of the Corbett Tiger Reserve and other senior forest officials to the Court of the Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, CBI, Dehradun. Justice Siddhartha Sah held that once the Central Bureau of Investigation completed…
Judgment
Gram Pradhan Election Challenge Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due to Defect in Affidavit; Such Defect Can Be Cured: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has refused to dismiss an election petition filed against the election of a Gram Pradhan and has held that a defect in the supporting affidavit is a curable defect. The Court ruled that such a deficiency cannot by itself result in rejection of an election petition at the initial stage. The…
Judgment
Election Petition Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Merely Due to Defects in Accompanying Affidavit: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that the requirement of filing an affidavit under the proviso to Section 83(1)(c) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 is not mandatory in a strict sense and substantial compliance with the legal requirement is sufficient. The Court further ruled that any defect in such an…
Judgment
Father Cannot Avoid Duty to Maintain Minor Child Due to Mother’s Income or Personal Liabilities: Uttarakhand High Court
The present matter before the Uttarakhand High Court arose from a criminal revision filed by the father challenging an order of the Family Court, Roorkee. The Family Court had directed him to pay ₹8,000 per month as interim maintenance to his minor child under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 on an…
Judgment
Cheque Bounce Case: Summons Against Nainital Man Quashed Over Non-Compliance of Section 202 CrPC: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court recently delivered an important judgment in a cheque dishonour dispute and set aside a summoning order issued by a trial court. The decision was delivered by Justice Ashish Naithani, who held that the magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 202 Code of…
Judgment
Errors Repeatedly Creeping into Judicial Exam Question Papers; Course Correction Ordered: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court examined serious irregularities in the preliminary examination of the Uttarakhand Judicial Service Civil Judge (Junior Division) Examination 2025, conducted by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (UKPSC) on 31 August 2025. The issue came before the Court after judicial aspirants…
Judgment
High Court Rejects Request to Re-Examine Complainant in Rs. 2.4 Lakh Cheque Bounce Case – What It Means for Justice! - High Court of Uttarakhand
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to Re-examine Complainant Rejected by High Court In a recent case heard by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the court has dismissed an application filed by the Petitioner, Lalit Singh Bisht, seeking the quashing of an order passed by the…
Judgment
Not Granting Divorce In A Dead Marriage Is 'Cruelty' To Both Husband And Wife: Uttarakhand High Court
NAINITAL, 1ST AUGUST, 2024 — The High Court of Uttarakhand has granted a divorce to Y and X, effectively ending their marriage due to prolonged separation and allegations of cruelty. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri and Hon’ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, marks a significant development in…
Judgment
Juveniles Tried As Adults Cannot Be Deprived Of Their Right To Bail Under Juvenile Justice Act: Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant ruling, the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital has granted bail to a Child in Conflict with Law (CIL), who was accused under Sections 376(3) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 5(j)(ii)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The decision, delivered by…
Order
Bail Denied to POCSO Accused Over Alleged Religious Conversion Through “Deep Coercion”, Court Flags Forged Aadhaar: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has rejected the first bail application of Tanveer, son of Anwar, in a case registered at Police Station Bahadrabad, Haridwar. The order was passed by Justice Rakesh Thapliyal on 30 June 2026. Tanveer sought regular bail in connection with FIR No. 0181 of 2025, dated 3 May 2026, involving…
Order
Blank Signed Cheque Defence Insufficient to Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 138 NI Act: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has dismissed a criminal revision filed by Ramesh Singh Nagarkoti against his conviction under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The order was passed by Justice Alok Mahra on 8 September 2026 in CRLR/646/2026. The case arose after respondent no. 2 gave Nagarkoti ₹2,00,000 on 28…
Order
Nainital Water Contamination: District Magistrate Directed to Set Up Public Helpline Within 24 Hours: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court is monitoring an epidemic caused by water contamination in affected villages and Nainital. The case was filed by Ravi Bisht against the State of Uttarakhand and others. On 08.09.2026, the Court was informed that Rs.4 lakh had been released from the untied fund for serological tests of…
Order
RTI Disclosure of Estranged Wife’s Service Details Refused, Privacy Cannot Be Overridden Without Public Interest: Uttarakhand High Court
Quick Summary The Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital has dismissed an appeal filed by Vijendra Kumar seeking service-related information about respondent no.4, who is his wife. The information had been sought from the Public Information Officer under the Right to Information Act concerning her service as an Assistant…
Order
Bigamy Case Cannot Be Quashed Merely Because 'Saptapadi' Was Not Proved at the Summoning Stage: Uttarakhand High Court
The Nainital bench of the Uttarakhand High Court has refused to dismiss a bigamy case against a man on the grounds that the proof of the 'Saptapadi' ceremony was not established at the stage of summoning. Justice Siddhartha Sah clarified that the issue of whether the essential rites of a second marriage, including the…
Order
Fair Hearing Must Prevail Over Expeditious Disposal; Ex Parte Order Against Wife Quashed: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has emphasized that the right to a fair hearing is fundamental, even in cases that demand speedy disposal. The Court clarified that while it is important to resolve matrimonial disputes quickly, this should not come at the expense of a party’s opportunity to present their case. The Court set…
Order
Maggi Noodles Misbranding Case Against Nestlé Quashed; Food Analyst's Report Held Legally Unsustainable: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against Nestlé India Limited and other applicants in the alleged Maggi 2-Minute Noodles misbranding case. Justice Alok Mahra held that the prosecution was based on a Food Analyst's Report issued by the State Food and Drug Testing Laboratory,…
Order
Victim's Death From Septicemia Was Direct Result of Burns; Life Sentence Upheld in 2018 Almora Acid Attack Case: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has upheld the conviction and life imprisonment awarded to Raghunath Singh in the 2018 Almora acid attack case. The Court held that the death of one of the victims during medical treatment due to septicemia was a direct consequence of the acid burn injuries suffered in the attack. Finding…
Order
Protection of Pre-Existing Service Conditions Justifies Separate Promotion Criteria for Absorbed Employees: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has upheld the validity of Clause 20(B) of the Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. Junior Engineer (Electrical & Mechanical) Service Bye-Laws, 2018, holding that the classification between employees directly appointed in UPCL and those absorbed from UPPCL is reasonable and does not violate…
Order
Accident Compensation Appeal Rejected; Claimant’s Guilty Plea Held to Prove His Negligence: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has dismissed a motor accident compensation appeal filed by Ashok Kumar, holding that his own admission of guilt in the criminal case arising from the accident clearly established that he was responsible for the incident. The Court ruled that a person who is himself responsible for causing…
Order
Arrest Memo Sufficient to Explain Charges, Plea Challenging CBI Arrest Rejected: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court delivered an important judgment in the case of Ravi Kant vs Central Bureau of Investigation, where the Court examined whether an arrest memo containing key allegations is sufficient to meet constitutional safeguards. The case revolved around the legality of arrest and judicial custody under…
Order
Two Men Acquitted in Gangsters Act Case, Criminal History Alone Not Sufficient for Conviction: Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant judgment, the Uttarakhand High Court examined the scope of conviction under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act and clarified that mere criminal history and inclusion in a gang chart are not sufficient to establish guilt. The case titled Hemu Pant @ Hemu Kalu and…
Call Detail Records Cannot Be Denied Solely on Privacy Grounds When Relevant to Fair Trial: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that a request for Call Detail Records (CDRs) and tower location information cannot be rejected merely because the records also contain information relating to a victim's privacy. When such electronic records appear prima facie relevant to a fair investigation or trial, the court…
About the Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court was established in 2000, when Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh. It has jurisdiction over the state of Uttarakhand.
Seat
Nainital
State / UT
Uttarakhand
Region
North India
