High Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Nainital
The Uttarakhand High Court was established in 2000, when Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh. It has jurisdiction over the state of Uttarakhand.
63+
News & Updates Published
Order
Bail Denied to POCSO Accused Over Alleged Religious Conversion Through “Deep Coercion”, Court Flags Forged Aadhaar: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has rejected the first bail application of Tanveer, son of Anwar, in a case registered at Police Station Bahadrabad, Haridwar. The order was passed by Justice Rakesh Thapliyal on 30 June 2026. Tanveer sought regular bail in connection with FIR No. 0181 of 2025, dated 3 May 2026, involving…
Order
Blank Signed Cheque Defence Insufficient to Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 138 NI Act: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has dismissed a criminal revision filed by Ramesh Singh Nagarkoti against his conviction under Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The order was passed by Justice Alok Mahra on 8 September 2026 in CRLR/646/2026. The case arose after respondent no. 2 gave Nagarkoti ₹2,00,000 on 28…
Order
Nainital Water Contamination: District Magistrate Directed to Set Up Public Helpline Within 24 Hours: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court is monitoring an epidemic caused by water contamination in affected villages and Nainital. The case was filed by Ravi Bisht against the State of Uttarakhand and others. On 08.09.2026, the Court was informed that Rs.4 lakh had been released from the untied fund for serological tests of…
Order
RTI Disclosure of Estranged Wife’s Service Details Refused, Privacy Cannot Be Overridden Without Public Interest: Uttarakhand High Court
Quick Summary The Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital has dismissed an appeal filed by Vijendra Kumar seeking service-related information about respondent no.4, who is his wife. The information had been sought from the Public Information Officer under the Right to Information Act concerning her service as an Assistant…
Call Detail Records Cannot Be Denied Solely on Privacy Grounds When Relevant to Fair Trial: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that a request for Call Detail Records (CDRs) and tower location information cannot be rejected merely because the records also contain information relating to a victim's privacy. When such electronic records appear prima facie relevant to a fair investigation or trial, the court…
Order
Bigamy Case Cannot Be Quashed Merely Because 'Saptapadi' Was Not Proved at the Summoning Stage: Uttarakhand High Court
The Nainital bench of the Uttarakhand High Court has refused to dismiss a bigamy case against a man on the grounds that the proof of the 'Saptapadi' ceremony was not established at the stage of summoning. Justice Siddhartha Sah clarified that the issue of whether the essential rites of a second marriage, including the…
Judgment
Proof of Saptapadi Ceremony Not Required at the Cognizance Stage in a Bigamy Complaint: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has made an important ruling regarding cases of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court clarified that proving whether the essential ceremonies of a second marriage, such as Saptapadi, were performed is a matter to be decided during the trial, not at the initial…
Order
Fair Hearing Must Prevail Over Expeditious Disposal; Ex Parte Order Against Wife Quashed: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has emphasized that the right to a fair hearing is fundamental, even in cases that demand speedy disposal. The Court clarified that while it is important to resolve matrimonial disputes quickly, this should not come at the expense of a party’s opportunity to present their case. The Court set…
Order
Maggi Noodles Misbranding Case Against Nestlé Quashed; Food Analyst's Report Held Legally Unsustainable: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against Nestlé India Limited and other applicants in the alleged Maggi 2-Minute Noodles misbranding case. Justice Alok Mahra held that the prosecution was based on a Food Analyst's Report issued by the State Food and Drug Testing Laboratory,…
Judgment
Corruption Trials Against Former Jim Corbett Director and Senior Forest Officials Transferred to Special CBI Court: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has ordered the transfer of two corruption cases involving the former Director of the Corbett Tiger Reserve and other senior forest officials to the Court of the Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, CBI, Dehradun. Justice Siddhartha Sah held that once the Central Bureau of Investigation completed…
Order
Victim's Death From Septicemia Was Direct Result of Burns; Life Sentence Upheld in 2018 Almora Acid Attack Case: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has upheld the conviction and life imprisonment awarded to Raghunath Singh in the 2018 Almora acid attack case. The Court held that the death of one of the victims during medical treatment due to septicemia was a direct consequence of the acid burn injuries suffered in the attack. Finding…
Order
Protection of Pre-Existing Service Conditions Justifies Separate Promotion Criteria for Absorbed Employees: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has upheld the validity of Clause 20(B) of the Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. Junior Engineer (Electrical & Mechanical) Service Bye-Laws, 2018, holding that the classification between employees directly appointed in UPCL and those absorbed from UPPCL is reasonable and does not violate…
Judgment
Proof of Saptapadi Ceremony Not Required at the Cognizance Stage in a Bigamy Complaint: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has made an important ruling regarding cases of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court clarified that proving whether the essential ceremonies of a second marriage, such as Saptapadi, were performed is a matter to be decided during the trial, not at the initial…
Judgment
Corruption Trials Against Former Jim Corbett Director and Senior Forest Officials Transferred to Special CBI Court: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has ordered the transfer of two corruption cases involving the former Director of the Corbett Tiger Reserve and other senior forest officials to the Court of the Special Judge, Anti-Corruption, CBI, Dehradun. Justice Siddhartha Sah held that once the Central Bureau of Investigation completed…
Judgment
Gram Pradhan Election Challenge Cannot Be Dismissed Merely Due to Defect in Affidavit; Such Defect Can Be Cured: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has refused to dismiss an election petition filed against the election of a Gram Pradhan and has held that a defect in the supporting affidavit is a curable defect. The Court ruled that such a deficiency cannot by itself result in rejection of an election petition at the initial stage. The…
Judgment
Election Petition Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Merely Due to Defects in Accompanying Affidavit: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that the requirement of filing an affidavit under the proviso to Section 83(1)(c) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 is not mandatory in a strict sense and substantial compliance with the legal requirement is sufficient. The Court further ruled that any defect in such an…
Judgment
Father Cannot Avoid Duty to Maintain Minor Child Due to Mother’s Income or Personal Liabilities: Uttarakhand High Court
The present matter before the Uttarakhand High Court arose from a criminal revision filed by the father challenging an order of the Family Court, Roorkee. The Family Court had directed him to pay ₹8,000 per month as interim maintenance to his minor child under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 on an…
Judgment
Cheque Bounce Case: Summons Against Nainital Man Quashed Over Non-Compliance of Section 202 CrPC: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court recently delivered an important judgment in a cheque dishonour dispute and set aside a summoning order issued by a trial court. The decision was delivered by Justice Ashish Naithani, who held that the magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 202 Code of…
Judgment
Errors Repeatedly Creeping into Judicial Exam Question Papers; Course Correction Ordered: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court examined serious irregularities in the preliminary examination of the Uttarakhand Judicial Service Civil Judge (Junior Division) Examination 2025, conducted by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (UKPSC) on 31 August 2025. The issue came before the Court after judicial aspirants…
Judgment
High Court Rejects Request to Re-Examine Complainant in Rs. 2.4 Lakh Cheque Bounce Case – What It Means for Justice! - High Court of Uttarakhand
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to Re-examine Complainant Rejected by High Court In a recent case heard by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, the court has dismissed an application filed by the Petitioner, Lalit Singh Bisht, seeking the quashing of an order passed by the…
Judgment
Not Granting Divorce In A Dead Marriage Is 'Cruelty' To Both Husband And Wife: Uttarakhand High Court
NAINITAL, 1ST AUGUST, 2024 — The High Court of Uttarakhand has granted a divorce to Y and X, effectively ending their marriage due to prolonged separation and allegations of cruelty. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri and Hon’ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, marks a significant development in…
Judgment
Juveniles Tried As Adults Cannot Be Deprived Of Their Right To Bail Under Juvenile Justice Act: Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant ruling, the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital has granted bail to a Child in Conflict with Law (CIL), who was accused under Sections 376(3) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 5(j)(ii)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The decision, delivered by…
Order
District Magistrate and SP Directed to Secure Uttarkashi Jama Masjid and Act Against Hate Speech: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has intervened in the growing controversy surrounding the Jama Masjid in Uttarkashi, directing authorities to ensure enhanced security around the mosque and to take strict action against hate speech and threats of demolition. Court’s Intervention in Escalating Dispute A Division Bench…
Order
Wife’s Request to Be Appointed Guardian of Comatose Husband Granted: Uttarakhand High Court
In an important judgment passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand, a writ petition was filed by Smt. Kamakshee Bisht seeking the appointment of a guardian for her husband, Mukesh Chand Joshi, who has been in a comatose state for an extended period. The petitioner’s husband, a permanent resident of Alma Cottage…
Order
Concerns Raised Over Spread of Chronic Disease Among Nainital Residents Due to Harsh Water of Naini Lake: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent ruling by the Uttarakhand High Court, the issue of environmental compensation under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 has been brought to the forefront. The court's decision sheds light on the responsibilities of hotel owners regarding wastewater management and its implications for…
Order
NIA Act, Appeals from Sessions Court Can Also Be Filed Before a Division Bench Court Denies Bail to Haldwani Violence Accused Abdul Malik: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent judgment dated September 2, 2024, delivered by Justice Ravindra Maithani, the Haldwani Sessions Court addressed a significant matter concerning bail applications under the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act. This case highlights the complexities of the NIA Act and the jurisdictional interplay between…
Order
Haldwani Violence , 'Delayed' Investigation, 'Negligent' , Court Grants Default Bail To 50 Accused: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent judgment from the High Court of Uttarakhand, the appellants, who had been arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA), were granted default bail due to significant delays in the investigation process. The judgment highlights the critical importance of timely investigation and…
Order
Court Directs District Legal Services Authorities To Hire Advocates To Help Release Of Undertrials Unable To Furnish Bail Bonds: Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant development, the Uttarakhand High Court, comprising Hon'ble Chief Justice Ritu Bahri and Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal, issued a directive aimed at ensuring that undertrial prisoners, who have been unable to secure their release due to the non-submission of bail bonds, receive appropriate legal…
Order
Husband cannot be held guilty of rape for having anal sex with wife: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent ruling by the Supreme Court of India, significant clarifications were made regarding the applicability of Section 377 IPC and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The case involved complex issues of consent and the legal boundaries of sexual conduct within marriage. Here’s a…
Order
POCSO Act, Showing Private Parts, Dirty Movies To A Child Is Prima Facie 'Sexual Harassment': Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent landmark judgment, the court has addressed the applicability of Section 377 IPC (unnatural offences) concerning consensual sexual acts between married couples and evaluated the implications of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for child protection. Case Overview: The…
Order
Husband Can't Be Held Guilty U/S 377 IPC For 'Unnatural Sex' With Wife: Uttarakhand High Court
In a significant ruling, the High Court has clarified the application of Section 377 IPC and its intersection with Section 375 IPC regarding consensual acts between a husband and wife, as well as the applicability of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) in such cases. This judgment…
Order
Wife's Refusal Of Carnal Intercourse Against Order Of Nature Due To Physical Incapacity Not Mental Cruelty: Uttarakhand High Court
Nainital: The Uttarakhand High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Justice Ravindra Maithani, delivered a significant judgment on July 19, 2024, in the case concerning maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by XYZ against the…
Order
Court Grants Protection To Inter-Faith Live-In Couple With Condition To Register Under State's UCC Law In 48 Hours: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent ruling, the Uttarakhand High Court addressed the concerns of two individuals involved in a live-in relationship who sought protection from threats posed by family members. The case highlights the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, 2024, which mandates the registration of live-in…
Order
Arbitrator Can Award Interest Anytime After The Award Is Passed Till Actual Payment Is Made: Uttarakhand High Court
In a recent judgment dated 01st May, 2024, the Hon’ble Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri and Hon’ble Sri Justice Rakesh Thapliyal of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital deliberated on an appeal from order No. 176 of 2023 between the State of Uttarakhand as the Appellant and M/s Bharat Bhoomi Builders as the…
Call Detail Records Cannot Be Denied Solely on Privacy Grounds When Relevant to Fair Trial: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that a request for Call Detail Records (CDRs) and tower location information cannot be rejected merely because the records also contain information relating to a victim's privacy. When such electronic records appear prima facie relevant to a fair investigation or trial, the court…
About the Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court was established in 2000, when Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh. It has jurisdiction over the state of Uttarakhand.
Seat
Nainital
State / UT
Uttarakhand
Region
North India
