India's #1 Legal News Portal
Law4u News Portal
High Court
Bombay High Court
Mumbai

The Bombay High Court is one of India's oldest High Courts, established in 1862. It has jurisdiction over Maharashtra, Goa, and the Union Territories of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu.

670+
News & Updates Published
Bombay High Court building
MV Act | 'Accident' Includes Sudden Slipping, Involvement of Another Vehicle Not Necessary for Claiming Compensation: Bombay High Court
Order
MV Act | 'Accident' Includes Sudden Slipping, Involvement of Another Vehicle Not Necessary for Claiming Compensation: Bombay High Court
In a notable decision strengthening the rights of accident victims, the Bombay High Court has ruled that involvement of another vehicle is not mandatory for an incident to be classified as an "accident" under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The judgment was delivered by Justice Shivkumar Dige on July 23, 2025, in First…
Notice Issued on Plea by Same-Sex Couple Seeking Inclusion as 'Spouse' for Tax Exemption Under Section 56(2)(x) of IT Act: Bombay High Court
Document
Notice Issued on Plea by Same-Sex Couple Seeking Inclusion as 'Spouse' for Tax Exemption Under Section 56(2)(x) of IT Act: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has issued a notice to the Attorney General of India in response to a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of the fifth proviso to Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petition has been filed by Payio Ashiho and his partner Vivek Divan, a same sex couple, who allege…
Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID Not Proof of Citizenship: Bombay High Court
Order
Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID Not Proof of Citizenship: Bombay High Court
In a significant judgment on August 6, 2025, the Bombay High Court ruled that merely possessing government-issued identity documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card or Voter ID card does not by itself establish Indian citizenship. The Court emphasized that citizenship is governed solely by the provisions of the…
Remarks on Wife's Cooking and Clothing Not Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Bombay High Court
Order
Remarks on Wife's Cooking and Clothing Not Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant ruling concerning Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), addressing the allegations of cruelty made by a woman against her husband and his family members. The case involved a woman who filed a criminal case under Section 498A against her husband, his…
Serving Order on Chartered Accountant Doesn’t Qualify as Service on Assessee: Bombay High Court
Order
Serving Order on Chartered Accountant Doesn’t Qualify as Service on Assessee: Bombay High Court
In a significant ruling under the Income Tax Act 1961, the Bombay High Court has addressed an important issue related to the service of orders by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the filing of appeals after the prescribed limitation period. The case revolves around the limitation period for filing an…
Entertainment Duty on Convenience Fees for Online Movie Tickets Upheld: Bombay High Court
Order
Entertainment Duty on Convenience Fees for Online Movie Tickets Upheld: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court, on Wednesday, upheld the constitutional validity of a key amendment introduced in 2014 to the Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, which allows the State of Maharashtra to levy entertainment duty on convenience fees exceeding ₹10 charged by cinema owners or online ticketing platforms like…
[Land Acquisition Act] Reference Application Under Section 28A Maintainable If Earlier Section 18 Application Not Decided on Merits: Bombay High Court
Order
[Land Acquisition Act] Reference Application Under Section 28A Maintainable If Earlier Section 18 Application Not Decided on Merits: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court, in a key ruling on land acquisition law, has held that an application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is maintainable even if the applicant had earlier filed a reference under Section 18, as long as that reference was not decided on merits. A Division Bench of Justices R.G.…
Can Caste Scrutiny Committees Suo Motu Recall Validity Orders of Caste Certificates? Matter Referred to Larger Bench: Bombay High Court
Order
Can Caste Scrutiny Committees Suo Motu Recall Validity Orders of Caste Certificates? Matter Referred to Larger Bench: Bombay High Court
On August 4, 2025, the Bombay High Court raised an important legal question concerning the Caste Scrutiny Committee (CSC) and its authority to recall caste validity certificates that were earlier granted, especially in cases where fraud, misrepresentation or suppression of facts was later discovered. A division bench…
Unstamped Agreement Cannot Justify Temporary Injunction Even If Execution Is Admitted by Defendant: Bombay High Court
Order
Unstamped Agreement Cannot Justify Temporary Injunction Even If Execution Is Admitted by Defendant: Bombay High Court
In a significant ruling under the Indian Stamp Act, the Bombay High Court has held that an unstamped and unregistered agreement cannot be relied upon to grant interim injunctions, even if both parties admit to its execution. The judgment, delivered by Justice S.G. Chapalgaonkar on July 29, 2025, emphasizes the strict…
Wife Accusing Husband of Impotency in Divorce Case Not Defamation: Bombay High Court
Order
Wife Accusing Husband of Impotency in Divorce Case Not Defamation: Bombay High Court
In a significant ruling on Section 499 and Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, the Bombay High Court on July 17, 2024, held that a wife’s allegation that her husband is impotent, when made in the context of matrimonial litigation, does not amount to defamation. The Court stated that such claims fall under Exception…
FIR Not Quashed for Reacting with Laughing Emoji to Operation Sindoor Praise: Bombay High Court
Order
FIR Not Quashed for Reacting with Laughing Emoji to Operation Sindoor Praise: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court on July 30, 2025, dismissed a plea filed by Farah Deeba, a Pune-based teacher, seeking to quash a criminal case registered against her. The controversy stemmed from Deeba reacting with a laughing emoji in a WhatsApp group discussion where members praised the Indian Army’s cross-border operation…
Live-In Agreement to Give Birth for Consideration Is Like Surrogacy, No Free Consent Involved, Court Refuses to Quash Rape Case: Bombay High Court
Order
Live-In Agreement to Give Birth for Consideration Is Like Surrogacy, No Free Consent Involved, Court Refuses to Quash Rape Case: Bombay High Court
In a significant ruling on July 28, 2025, the Bombay High Court declined to quash a rape FIR against a man who allegedly entered into a surrogacy-like agreement with a woman hired as domestic help. The division bench comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Sanjay Deshmukh ruled that such an agreement cannot be…
Rejects Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Circulating Objectionable Images on WhatsApp: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Rejects Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Circulating Objectionable Images on WhatsApp: Bombay High Court
The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by Nikhil s/o Madhukar Thepale, challenging the rejection of his anticipatory bail application in a case registered at Ghuggus Police Station, Chandrapur. Justice Y. G. Khobragade passed the judgment on 29.09.2026 in Criminal Appeal No. 127 of…
Vinayak Raut’s Election Petition Against Narayan Rane Rejected for Vague Pleadings: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Vinayak Raut’s Election Petition Against Narayan Rane Rejected for Vague Pleadings: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has rejected an election petition filed by Vinayak Bhaurao Raut challenging the 2024 Lok Sabha election from the 46 Ratnagiri-Sindhudurg Constituency. The order was passed by Justice Shailesh P. Brahme on 29 September 2026. Indian Kanoon Narayan Tatu Rane, the returned candidate, had sought…
₹3.14 Crore GST Pre-Deposit Ordered to Be Refunded to IBM India After 64% of Demand Dropped: Bombay High Court
Judgment
₹3.14 Crore GST Pre-Deposit Ordered to Be Refunded to IBM India After 64% of Demand Dropped: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra tax authorities to refund a sum of ₹3,14,58,422 to IBM India Pvt. Ltd. after a substantial part of the original GST demand was dropped in the company’s appeal. The case, titled IBM India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., involved a dispute over a hefty tax demand…
Probate Grants Must Be Issued Within 2 Weeks of Court Order, Subsequent Caveats Barred: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Probate Grants Must Be Issued Within 2 Weeks of Court Order, Subsequent Caveats Barred: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has issued important directions for officers exercising functions under its Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction, making it clear that once an order directing issuance of a grant has been passed, the process should not be kept open for checking whether a fresh Caveat or cross Petition has been…
Have Vijay Mallya's Debts Been Cleared Using His Assets?   Court Seeks Clarification from ED, Banks: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Have Vijay Mallya's Debts Been Cleared Using His Assets? Court Seeks Clarification from ED, Banks: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has directed the State Bank of India and the Enforcement Directorate to verify whether the outstanding debts and liabilities of businessman Vijay Vittal Mallya have been cleared from money recovered through the movable properties attached by the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of…
' Victim' in Rape Cases Is a Myth; Women Respond to Trauma in Different Ways: Bombay High Court
Judgment
' Victim' in Rape Cases Is a Myth; Women Respond to Trauma in Different Ways: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court, in a landmark judgment on August 6, 2026, has challenged the long-held belief that victims of sexual assault must behave in a specific, stereotypical manner to be believed by courts. The Court, while convicting Tarun Tejpal in a 2013 rape case, emphasized that women deal with trauma in different…
Working Wife Earning Sufficient Independent Income Cannot Seek Interim Maintenance Solely on the Ground of Exorbitant Living Costs Abroad: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Working Wife Earning Sufficient Independent Income Cannot Seek Interim Maintenance Solely on the Ground of Exorbitant Living Costs Abroad: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has refused to grant interim maintenance to a professionally qualified woman residing and working in the United States, holding that Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 applies only where a spouse does not have sufficient independent means to maintain himself or herself during the pendency…
Written Statement Filing Deadline Commences Only After Valid Service of Summons: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Written Statement Filing Deadline Commences Only After Valid Service of Summons: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has held that the statutory limitation period for filing a written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 commences only after a writ of summons is properly served upon the defendant, the defendant expressly waives such service, or the court specifically directs…
Right to Be Forgotten | Litigant's Name Directed to Be Masked in Online Court Records After FIR Quashed: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Right to Be Forgotten | Litigant's Name Directed to Be Masked in Online Court Records After FIR Quashed: Bombay High Court
The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that the Right to Privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the Right to Be Forgotten. While deciding Criminal Writ Petition No. 470 of 2026, the Court directed the Registry to mask the identity of a petitioner whose criminal case had…
No One Can Compel an Adult Woman to Return Home or Marry; Personal Liberty Protected: Bombay High Court
Judgment
No One Can Compel an Adult Woman to Return Home or Marry; Personal Liberty Protected: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that an adult woman has the fundamental right to decide where she wants to live, whether she wishes to marry and whether she wants to pursue higher education. The Court held that neither parents nor the State can compel a major woman to return to her parental home or force her into…
Mere Execution of Family Arrangement Does Not Constitute Admission That Suit Properties Are HUF Properties: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Mere Execution of Family Arrangement Does Not Constitute Admission That Suit Properties Are HUF Properties: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has clarified an important legal principle relating to disputes over Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) properties. The Court held that merely executing a family arrangement does not amount to an admission that the properties covered under the arrangement are HUF properties. The Court observed that…
Mere Suspicion of Extra-Marital Affair Not Enough to Invoke Section 498A Against Relative; Case Against Husband's Cousin's Wife Quashed: Bombay High Court
Judgment
Mere Suspicion of Extra-Marital Affair Not Enough to Invoke Section 498A Against Relative; Case Against Husband's Cousin's Wife Quashed: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has ruled that vague allegations and mere suspicion of an alleged extra-marital relationship are not sufficient to prosecute a relative under Section 498A IPC. The Court held that criminal law cannot be invoked on assumptions without credible evidence and quashed the criminal proceedings against…
Pouring Kerosene on Wife and Telling Her to Die Amounts to Abetment of Suicide, Conviction Upheld: Bombay High Court
Order
Pouring Kerosene on Wife and Telling Her to Die Amounts to Abetment of Suicide, Conviction Upheld: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad has dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 163 of 2016 filed by Vijay s/o Amrit Patil, upholding his conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for abetting the suicide of his wife, Surekha. In a judgment pronounced on October 6, 2026, Justice Abhay S. Waghwase upheld the…
Digital Arrest Fraud Case: Bail Denied to Accused Whose Account Received ₹4.03 Crore: Bombay High Court
Order
Digital Arrest Fraud Case: Bail Denied to Accused Whose Account Received ₹4.03 Crore: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, has rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Anuj Satendra Saxena in a case involving an alleged digital arrest fraud of Rs. 7.17 crore. Justice R. M. Joshi passed the order on October 5, 2026. The case relates to C.R. No. 12/2025 registered at Ahilyanagar Taluka…
Students Have Right to Peaceful Protest: Report Sought on Recruitment, Exam Leak and Traffic Flow: Bombay High Court
Order
Students Have Right to Peaceful Protest: Report Sought on Recruitment, Exam Leak and Traffic Flow: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has sought a detailed response from the Maharashtra government over protests in Pune concerning alleged malpractices and a paper leak in the MPSC Drug Inspector recruitment examination. A division bench of Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait M. Sethna passed the order on…
Seizes Mobile Phone, Orders ₹10,000 Payment for Unauthorised Recording of Court Proceedings: Bombay High Court
Order
Seizes Mobile Phone, Orders ₹10,000 Payment for Unauthorised Recording of Court Proceedings: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has ordered seizure and confiscation of the mobile phone of Dilip Wagh after he was caught recording court proceedings without permission. A Division Bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale passed the order on October 5, 2026. The incident took place at about 12:23 p.m.,…
Unregistered Partnership Firm Entitled to Statutory Tenancy Protection Under Section 15-A of Bombay Rent Control Act: Bombay High Court
Order
Unregistered Partnership Firm Entitled to Statutory Tenancy Protection Under Section 15-A of Bombay Rent Control Act: Bombay High Court
The dispute revolves around a shop situated on the Ground Floor of Mayfair Building, 75, C Veer Nariman Road, Fort, Mumbai 400 020. The firm All India Travel Services, represented by its partner Shri. Subhash Jain, entered into a leave and license agreement on 30.05.1966 with the original tenant, S. T. Upadhayay. The…
NPPA Cannot Impose Drug Ceiling Price Without Following DPCO Formula, Pharmed Demand Quashed: Bombay High Court
Order
NPPA Cannot Impose Drug Ceiling Price Without Following DPCO Formula, Pharmed Demand Quashed: Bombay High Court
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Anil Ahluwalia seeking an FIR and police investigation over the death of his wife during the COVID-19 pandemic. The petition, CRL.M.C. 119/2026, challenged a Sessions Court order that had upheld the Magistrate’s refusal to direct registration of an FIR. According…
State Best Equipped to Decide Land Requirement for Airport, Farmers’ Challenge to Purandar Airport Site Rejected: Bombay High Court
Order
State Best Equipped to Decide Land Requirement for Airport, Farmers’ Challenge to Purandar Airport Site Rejected: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by three agriculturists challenging the selection of “Site 1A” for the proposed Greenfield Airport at Purandar, Pune, and opposing the acquisition of their agricultural land. The petition was filed by Pandit Shivaji Kumbharkar, Vikas Kaluram Kumbharkar and…
Case Against Man Accused of Threatening Cop Quashed After Mobile Video Showed ₹300 Bribe Demand: Bombay High Court
Order
Case Against Man Accused of Threatening Cop Quashed After Mobile Video Showed ₹300 Bribe Demand: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings against Mukesh W. Siyal in a case registered at Kasturba Marg Police Station, Borivali East. The order was passed on September 10, 2026 by Justice Milind N. Jadhav. The case arose from an incident on February 4, 2018, when Siyal was stopped on Dattapada Road,…
Creating WhatsApp Group Without TISS Permission Insufficient for Compulsory Retirement Without Proof of Personal Gain: Bombay High Court
Order
Creating WhatsApp Group Without TISS Permission Insufficient for Compulsory Retirement Without Proof of Personal Gain: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of Dr. Swapan Garain, a professor at Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), in a case challenging his suspension and compulsory retirement. The court found that the disciplinary actions taken against him were disproportionate and unlawful. Background of the Case Dr. Garain,…
Bail Challenge Rejected in Fatal Road Accident Case Involving Juvenile at the Time of Incident: Bombay High Court
Order
Bail Challenge Rejected in Fatal Road Accident Case Involving Juvenile at the Time of Incident: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has rejected a revision application challenging an order that cancelled bail granted to a minor who was 17 years and 8 months old when a road accident took place on 5 February 2026. According to the prosecution, the minor was driving his father’s car rashly and at excessive speed when it hit a…
Custody of 11-Year-Old Girl Not Transferred to Biological Parents, Stability and Her Expressed Preference Cited: Bombay High Court
Order
Custody of 11-Year-Old Girl Not Transferred to Biological Parents, Stability and Her Expressed Preference Cited: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has dismissed Writ Petition No. 3975 of 2023 filed by Yogesh Gangaram Sanap and Rupali Yogesh Sanap, who sought interim custody of their minor daughter from the Respondent. The dispute arose after the child, born on 1 December 2014, had remained with the Respondent and his wife since infancy,…
ST Student Also Entitled to Three-Month Extension for Caste Validity Certificate: Bombay High Court
Order
ST Student Also Entitled to Three-Month Extension for Caste Validity Certificate: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court’s Circuit Bench at Kolhapur considered a petition filed by Snehal Anandrao Bhosale concerning her admission to the B.Sc. Honors Agriculture course for the academic year 2026-27. She had secured admission against a seat reserved for the Scheduled Tribe category, but her Tribe Validity Certificate…
No other news items found for Bombay High Court yet. Please check back soon.

About the Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court is one of India's oldest High Courts, established in 1862. It has jurisdiction over Maharashtra, Goa, and the Union Territories of Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu.

Seat
Mumbai
State / UT
Maharashtra
Region
West India

1M+

Downloads

Everything legal, in the Law4u app

Verified Advocates

Connect with vetted, verified lawyers

All Bar & State Acts

Every act, always up to date

Judgments

Search and read full judgments

Drafting

Ready legal drafts and templates

Constitution

The full Constitution, searchable

Daily Case Law

Fresh case law updates every day