India's #1 Legal News Portal

18 Languages | Login / Register

Judgment

Supreme Court quashes FIR, upholding validity of alleged marriage promise

28 Jan 2024 1 min read

Supreme Court quashes FIR, upholding validity of alleged marriage promise

New Delhi, January 3, 2024: In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court quashed Case Crime no.106 of 2016 in Criminal Appeal 32 of 2024, arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) no.147 of 2017. The case involved Ajeet Singh, the appellant, against the State of Uttar Pradesh & Others. Factual Aspects: 1. Ajeet Singh was accused under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC based on a First Information Report…

Read the full news in the Law4u app

Only today's news can be read in full on the website. This news is from 28 Jan 2024. Open it in the Law4u app, or in the Law4u web app on a computer, to read the complete story.

Don't have the app yet? Get it on Google Play or the App Store.

Latest News

Shriram Finance Cheque Bounce Case: Md. Nasir Convicted Over ₹2 Lakh Cheque: Delhi Court

Shriram Finance Cheque Bounce Case: Md. Nasir Convicted Over ₹2 Lakh Cheque: Delhi Court

Pressing a Woman’s Mouth and Lying on Her Without Attempted Penetration Does Not Amount to Attempted Rape: Patna High Court

Pressing a Woman’s Mouth and Lying on Her Without Attempted Penetration Does Not Amount to Attempted Rape: Patna High Court

Google’s Gmail Services Do Not Constitute a Public Function, Janta Live’s Plea Dismissed: Delhi High Court

Google’s Gmail Services Do Not Constitute a Public Function, Janta Live’s Plea Dismissed: Delhi High Court

Compensation for Injured Student Upheld, ITRs Held Relevant for Assessing Income and Future Prospects: Gujarat High Court

Compensation for Injured Student Upheld, ITRs Held Relevant for Assessing Income and Future Prospects: Gujarat High Court

Vijay Deverakonda’s Personality Rights Protected, Takedown of AI Deepfakes and Unauthorised Merchandise Ordered: Delhi High Court

Vijay Deverakonda’s Personality Rights Protected, Takedown of AI Deepfakes and Unauthorised Merchandise Ordered: Delhi High Court

Litigant Should Not Suffer for Lawyer’s Mistake, 1,093-Day Delay Condoned: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Litigant Should Not Suffer for Lawyer’s Mistake, 1,093-Day Delay Condoned: Madhya Pradesh High Court

1M+

Downloads

Everything legal, in the Law4u app

Verified Advocates

Connect with vetted, verified lawyers

All Bar & State Acts

Every act, always up to date

Judgments

Search and read full judgments

Drafting

Ready legal drafts and templates

Constitution

The full Constitution, searchable

Daily Case Law

Fresh case law updates every day

Get it on Google Play

Download on the App Store