India's #1 Legal News Portal

18 Languages | Login / Register

Order

LinkedIn Profile Not Valid Proof Of Income: Supreme Court Rejects Wife’s ₹12 Crore Alimony & BMW Demand

06 Aug 2025 3 min read

The Supreme Court on Monday ended an eight-year-long matrimonial dispute by dissolving the marriage between the appellant husband and the respondent wife. The Court exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, holding that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The Court granted the wife a flat in Mumbai as alimony but rejected her extravagant demands for ₹12 crore, a BMW car, and additional compensation. Earlier Settlement Agreement Was…

Read the full news in the Law4u app

Only today's news can be read in full on the website. This news is from 06 Aug 2025. Open it in the Law4u app, or in the Law4u web app on a computer, to read the complete story.

Don't have the app yet? Get it on Google Play or the App Store.

Latest News

Shriram Finance Cheque Bounce Case: Md. Nasir Convicted Over ₹2 Lakh Cheque: Delhi Court

Shriram Finance Cheque Bounce Case: Md. Nasir Convicted Over ₹2 Lakh Cheque: Delhi Court

Pressing a Woman’s Mouth and Lying on Her Without Attempted Penetration Does Not Amount to Attempted Rape: Patna High Court

Pressing a Woman’s Mouth and Lying on Her Without Attempted Penetration Does Not Amount to Attempted Rape: Patna High Court

Google’s Gmail Services Do Not Constitute a Public Function, Janta Live’s Plea Dismissed: Delhi High Court

Google’s Gmail Services Do Not Constitute a Public Function, Janta Live’s Plea Dismissed: Delhi High Court

Compensation for Injured Student Upheld, ITRs Held Relevant for Assessing Income and Future Prospects: Gujarat High Court

Compensation for Injured Student Upheld, ITRs Held Relevant for Assessing Income and Future Prospects: Gujarat High Court

Vijay Deverakonda’s Personality Rights Protected, Takedown of AI Deepfakes and Unauthorised Merchandise Ordered: Delhi High Court

Vijay Deverakonda’s Personality Rights Protected, Takedown of AI Deepfakes and Unauthorised Merchandise Ordered: Delhi High Court

Litigant Should Not Suffer for Lawyer’s Mistake, 1,093-Day Delay Condoned: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Litigant Should Not Suffer for Lawyer’s Mistake, 1,093-Day Delay Condoned: Madhya Pradesh High Court

1M+

Downloads

Everything legal, in the Law4u app

Verified Advocates

Connect with vetted, verified lawyers

All Bar & State Acts

Every act, always up to date

Judgments

Search and read full judgments

Drafting

Ready legal drafts and templates

Constitution

The full Constitution, searchable

Daily Case Law

Fresh case law updates every day

Get it on Google Play

Download on the App Store