Showing 10460 articles
Mere Suspicion on Wife’s Character Without Instigation Not Abetment to Suicide, Husband Acquitted: Uttarakhand High Court
The Uttarakhand High Court delivered a significant judgment in the case of Sunil Dutt Pathak versus State of Uttarakhand, clarifying that mere suspicion of a spouse’s character or mental harassment, without any proximate act of instigation or intentional aiding, does not constitute abetment of suicide under Sections…
Second Application for Compensation Re-determination Maintainable After High Court Ruling: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Andanayya and Ors. versus Deputy Chief Engineer and Ors., clarifying that landowners can file applications more than once for revised compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act if higher courts later enhance the award. The case arose from…
State’s Power to Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption Upheld, One-Year Relief Granted to Industries: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India delivered a crucial judgment balancing State policy powers and industrial interests, holding that tax exemptions can be withdrawn but not abruptly. The ruling ensures fairness by mandating a transition period for industries affected by such policy changes. Background of the Case The case…
Vicarious Liability of Independent Director Under Section 138 NI Act Explained: Delhi High Court
This case arose from a dispute involving cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The matter was heard on 25 March 2026 in the case of Manish Goyal vs S P Realtors. The dispute focuses on whether an Independent Director can be held liable for offences committed by a company under Section 138…
Dowry Cruelty Case Against In-Laws Quashed Due to Vague Allegations and 7-Year Delay: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India delivered an important judgment on 25 March 2026 in a matrimonial dispute related to allegations under Section 498A Indian Penal Code and Section 354 Indian Penal Code. The Court examined whether criminal proceedings against in-laws could continue when allegations were general, unsupported,…
Higher Pension Claim Allowed Despite Missing Employer Records, Employee Rights Protected Under EPF Law: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court delivered a significant judgment safeguarding the rights of employees seeking higher pension benefits. The Court ruled that employees cannot be denied pension merely due to missing records maintained by employers, reinforcing the welfare nature of pension laws. Background of the Case The case…
Slams Safety Lapses, Orders Compensation for Deaths of Three Children in Hydel Tank Incident: Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court delivered a significant judgment holding government authorities liable for negligence that resulted in the tragic death of three minor children. The Court emphasized that failure to ensure basic safety measures amounts to violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India.…
₹36.50 Crores Authorized to Clear Victim Compensation Arrears, ₹12.26 Crores for Mediator Fee Arrears: State Tells Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has taken strict note of delays in payment of victim compensation and mediator fees, warning the State of Kerala of strong action including attachment of treasury accounts. The matter highlights serious concerns regarding implementation of victim compensation mechanisms and mediation…
Proclamation Order and LOC Against Australian Citizen Quashed for Failure to Serve Notice Abroad: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court delivered an important judgment on 26 March 2026 in the case of Manish Popli v. CBI, emphasizing that legal procedures for declaring a person as absconding must strictly follow due process. The Court clarified that failure to properly serve notice to an accused residing abroad makes proclamation…
Discharge from Air Force on Grounds of Cumulative Unsuitability Not a Punishment: Gauhati High Court
The Gauhati High Court delivered an important judgment clarifying the distinction between discharge and punishment in armed forces service law. The decision was passed by a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Ashutosh Kumar and Justice Arun Dev Choudhury. The Court held that discharge of an airman on the ground of…
