Showing 10460 articles
Wife and Her Family Cannot Be Prosecuted for ‘Dowry-Giving’ Based on Her Complaint Against Husband for Taking Dowry: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India delivered a crucial judgment clarifying that a wife and her family members cannot be prosecuted for “giving dowry” merely based on statements made in their complaint against dowry demand. The Court emphasized the protection granted under Section 7(3) of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961,…
SOP Issued Mandating Strict Timeline Framework for Filing Legal Aid Appeals: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India issued a landmark judgment introducing a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to address delays in legal aid appeals. The Court emphasized that timely justice is a core part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.…
Family Courts Cannot ‘Casually’ Order Spouse to Undergo Medical Examination to Ascertain Mental Health: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court delivered an important ruling stating that Family Courts cannot casually direct a spouse to undergo a medical examination to determine mental health. The Court emphasized that such orders must be passed only after proper application of mind and based on sufficient evidence, especially in cases…
‘State Cannot Exercise Unfettered Discretion in Tender Matters or Deviate from Notice Conditions Without Reasons’: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court delivered a crucial judgment holding that the State cannot exercise unlimited or arbitrary powers in tender matters. The Court emphasized that government authorities must act fairly and cannot deviate from tender conditions without proper reasons, reinforcing the principles of transparency and…
Child Care Leave Policy Protects Motherhood, Denial Violates Rights of Mother and Child: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court delivered an important judgment emphasizing that the Child Care Leave Policy is crucial for protecting motherhood and ensuring the welfare of children. The Court highlighted that denying such leave can violate not only the rights of the mother but also the rights of the child, which are protected…
PIL on Bar Timings Disposed After Stakeholder Meet Resolves Labour Concerns: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation concerning amendments in liquor regulations affecting bar hotel working hours. The Court noted that the issues raised were largely resolved through a government-led consultation process, making further judicial intervention unnecessary. Background of the…
Withdrawal Slip Drawn on Co-operative Society Engaged in Banking Activities Qualifies as ‘Cheque’ Under Section 6 NI Act: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court delivered a significant ruling clarifying that a withdrawal slip issued by a cooperative society engaged in banking activities can be treated as a cheque under the Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This judgment has important implications for cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of…
Accused in Rape and POCSO Case Cannot Be Declared ‘Proclaimed Offender’, Only ‘Proclaimed Person’: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court delivered an important judgment clarifying the legal distinction between a “proclaimed offender” and a “proclaimed person” under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court held that in cases involving Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, an accused…
Bail Granted to Man Accused of Operating Fake Embassy, Posing as ‘Consul’: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to an accused involved in a sensational case of allegedly running a fake embassy and posing as a diplomat. The Court considered the stage of investigation and legal provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, while deciding the bail application. Background of the Case The…
‘Not a Sudden Quarrel’ Murder Conviction Upheld for Killing Friend Over ₹200 Loan: Bombay High Court ‘
The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction and life imprisonment of an आरोपी who murdered his friend over a minor dispute of Rs 200. The Court clarified that such an act cannot be treated as a “sudden quarrel” and clearly falls under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, dealing with punishment for murder. Background…
